Belgium is going to the polls in June, with integration of ‘migrants’ being an hot issue. Each and everyday day I’m getting election flyers claiming social/ethnic integration in Belgium either failed/succeeded/must be improved. So, was does “successful integration” really entail?
For starters, a general definition of “integration”: “The bringing of people of different social, racial or ethnic groups into unrestricted and equal association, as in society”. OK, that seems like a fair start: “unrestricted and equal association”.
Next, a theoretical view on diversity:
“Diversity equates fostering an inclusive environment where the individual differences among us are understood, respected and appreciated, recognized as a source of strength and valued as qualities that enrich the society in which we live”
Social reality check, Belgium 2007 (all quotes from translated election leaflets):
- On poor “migrants” from countries like Morocco or poverty-stricken former Eastern Block EU countries:
“in 2005 up to 70% of poor 2nd generation Moroccans in Brussels married a non-local partner, often by ‘importing’ their partner from their native country. These women arrived in Belgium to get married, got children, stayed at home, completely dependent on their partner. Very few speak Dutch. In general these migrants suffer from unemployment rates up to 5x the Belgian average. Employed male migrants from the new EU countries often hold non-registered and dangerous jobs. Most of their children never make it through high-school in Belgium.”
- On rich “migrants”/expats working for the EU (or related multinational organizations) :
“Virtually all these migrants live in the wealthy Brussels suburban areas, having their own private schools, shops and social clubs. Most enjoy very high standards of living. Most speak their native language (predominantly English) in public and make no real effort whatsoever to ‘integrate’ into Belgian society. The exorbitant wages payed to EU staff have caused rents in suburban Brussels to skyrocket, driving away native Belgians and creating ‘rich EU/expat” ghettos.”
OK, so I may be living in a multicultural country, but all I read about are high gates, self-chosen (eg the Chassidic Jews that control the Antwerp Diamond trade) or factual segregation and profoundly separated communities.
Given that the Dutch/French natives of Belgium never succeeded in “integrating” themselves (this country has a strict language barrier, there is no “unified Belgian society”), must I assume that “integration” is just an empty word in Belgium, currently used and abused to get votes? Help me out here, I’m getting confused: has “integration” been “successful” if all communities just continue to lead their predominantly separate lives, without social incidents?